No. Heat resistance is creep strength plus a stable oxide scale at temperature; corrosion resistance is behaviour in a specific aqueous medium. The alloying that delivers one usually works against the other, which is why Hastelloy X and Hastelloy C-276 are not interchangeable despite sharing a family name.
Two different failure modes
A heat-resistant part fails by bulging, by cracking at a grain boundary after thousands of hours under load, or by scale spalling off until the section is too thin. Design is driven by stress, temperature and time — creep rupture data, not corrosion tables.
A corrosion-resistant part fails by uniform metal loss, by pitting, or by cracking. Design is driven by the medium: its chemistry, its temperature, its chloride content, whether it is aerated, and whether the surface can repassivate.
Why the alloying pulls in opposite directions
Chromium and aluminium build the protective oxide — chromia for most grades, alumina for 602CA and similar — and that is what buys high-temperature life. Chromium also helps in oxidising acids.
Molybdenum buys resistance to reducing acids and to chloride pitting, and it is the element that makes C-276 and B3 work. But a molybdenum-rich alloy oxidises badly above roughly 800-900 °C, because the oxide it forms is volatile rather than protective.
So the two requirements genuinely conflict. A grade tuned for 1100 °C service is rarely the grade that survives boiling hydrochloric acid, and vice versa.
The one question that settles it
Is the aggressive environment a hot gas or an aqueous liquid? If it is a hot gas — flue, combustion, furnace atmosphere — you are choosing among the heat-resistant grades: X, 617, 602CA, and the cast 713C where the part is a turbine component.
If it is a liquid, even a hot one under pressure, you are choosing among the corrosion grades, and the deciding facts are the acid, the chloride level and the temperature. Tell us those three and the shortlist is short.